Transmission capacity of wireless ad hoc networks with successive interference cancellation

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 53(8): pp. 2799-2814.The transmission capacity (TC) of a wireless ad hoc network is defined as the maximum spatial intensity of successful transmissions such that the outage probability does not exceed some specified threshold. This work studies the improvement in TC obtainable with successive interference cancellation (SIC), an important receiver technique that has been shown to achieve the capacity of several classes of multiuser channels, but has not been carefully evaluated in the context of ad hoc wireless networks. This paper develops closed-form upper bounds and easily computable lower bounds for the TC of ad hoc networks with SIC receivers, for both perfect and imperfect SIC. The analysis applies to any multiuser receiver that cancels the K strongest interfering signals by a factor : E [0; 1]. In addition to providing the first closed-form capacity results for SIC in ad hoc networks, design-relevant insights are made possible. In particular, it is shown that SIC should be used with direct sequence spread spectrum. Also, any imperfections in the interference cancellation rapidly degrade its usefulness. More encouragingly, only a few—often just one—interfering nodes need to be canceled in order to get the vast majority of the available performance gain

Entrepreneurial intentions and entrepreneurship education to University students in Portugal

[EN] This article analyzes entrepreneurial intentions and motivations that encourage university students of Tourism to create their own company. Methodology is based on an empirical study, using a questionnaire adapted from a model of Veciana and Urbano (Actitudes de los estudiantes universitarios hacia la creación de empresas: un estudio empírico comparativo entre Catalunya y Puerto Rico. El emprendedor innovador y la creación de empresas de I + D + I, University of Valencia, pp 35 58, 2004), including the desirability and viability concepts. One hundred and sixty students answered the questionnaire from a total study population of 243 official Tourism degree students of the Superior Institute of Accounting and Management of Porto. This research finds out that the university students have a very positive perception about the desire to create their own company; a 90 % of students express their desire to do it, and 83.5 % express their intention. Moreover, a 57.5 % think that within actual crisis it is more difficult to do than before it. This research lets us get an in-depth study of a student of Tourism degree, finding out his entrepreneurial attitudes. It can be the first step to wake up and encourage students interest for starting up their own business.Del Rio-Rama, MDLC.; Peris-Ortiz, M.; Álvarez García, J.; Rueda Armengot, C. (2016). Entrepreneurial intentions and entrepreneurship education to University students in Portugal. Technology, Innovation and Education. 2(7):1-11. doi:10.1186/s40660-016-0013-5S11127Ajzen I (1991) The theory of plannes behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211Aponte M (2002) Factores condicionantes de la creación de empresas en Puerto Rico: un enfoque institucional. Doctoral dissertation, Autonomous University of BarcelonaAponte M, Urbano D, Veciana JM (2006) Actitudes hacia la creación de empresas: un estudio comparativo entre Catalunya y Puerto Rico. Centro de Investigaciones Comerciales e Iniciativas Académicas de la Facultad de Administración de Empresas. Forum Empresarial 11(2):52–75Bae TJ, Qian S, Miao C, Fiet JO (2014) The relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions: a meta-analytic review. Entrep Theory Pract 38(2):217–254Brice J (2004) The role of personality dimensions on the formation of entrepreneurial intentions. USASBE Small Business Advancement National Center. University of Central Arkansas, USACabana-Villca R, Cortes-Castillo I, Plaza-Pasten D, Castillo-Vergara M, Alvarez-Marin A (2013) Análisis de las capacidades emprendedoras potenciales y efectivas en alumnos de centros de educación superior. J Technol Manag Innov 8(1):65–75Davidsson P (1989) Continued entrepreneurship and small firm business. Stockholm School of Economics, StockholmDavidsson P (1995) Culture, structure and regional levels of entrepreneurship. Entrep Reg Dev 7(1):41–62De Jorge-Moreno J, Castillo LL, Triguero MS (2012) The effect of business and economics education programs on students’ entrepreneurial intention. Eur J Train Dev 36(4):409–425Díaz JC, Hernández RM, Barata ML (2007) Estudiantes universitarios y creación de empresas. Un análisis comparativo entre España y Portugal. In Ayala, J.C. (coord.) Conocimiento, innovación y emprendedores: camino al futuro. Grupo FEDRA, MadridDo Paço AMF, Ferreira JM, Raposo M, Rodrigues RG, Dinis A (2011) Behaviours and entrepreneurial intention: empirical findings about secondary students. J Int Entrep 9(1):20–38Dohse D, Walter SG (2010) The role of entrepreneurship education and regional context in forming entrepreneurial intentions (No. 2010, 18). Document de treball de l’IEBEuropean Commission (2006). Entrepreneurship education in Europe: Fostering entrepreneurial mindsets through education and learning, Final Proceedings of the Conference on Entrepreneurship Education in OsloEurostat (2014) Informes sobre el empleo en la Unión Europea. Available in: http://europa.eu/publications/statistics/index_es.htmFuentes F, Saco F, Rodríguez P (2013) Estudio sobre el perfil emprendedor en el alumnado universitario de Córdoba. UCO Consejo Social de la Universidad de Córdoba, III Edición, Córdoba, pp 1–180Fuentes García FJ (2007) Análisis del Perfil Emprendedor del alumnado universitario y preuniversitario de Córdoba. Consejo Social Universidad de Córdoba, pp 1–105Genesca Garrigosa E, Veciana Verges JM (1984) Actitudes hacia la creación de empresas. Información Comercial Española 611:147–155Gerba DT (2012) Impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intentions of business and engineering students in Ethiopia. Afr J Econ Manag Stud 3(2):258–277Gorman G, Hanlon D, King W (1997) Some research perspectives on entrepreneurship education and education for small business management: a ten-year literature review. Int Small Bus J 15(3):56–77Guerrero M, Rialp J, Urbano D (2008) The impact of desirability and feasibility on entrepreneurial intentions: a structural equation model. Int Entrep Manag J 4(1):35–50Haynie JM, Shepherd DA, McMullen JS (2009) An opportunity for me? The role of resources in opportunity evaluation decisions. J Manage Stud 46(3):337–361Hernangomez J, Martín N, Rodriguez AI, Saboia F (2005) El emprendedor nace o se hace? Un análisis de los determinantes del espíritu emprendedor. XVI Spanish-Portuguese Meeting of Scientic Management. Sevilla:33–44Hmieleski KM, Corbett AC (2006) Proclivity for improvisation as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. J Small Bus Manage 44(1):45–63Honjo Y (2004) Growth of new start-up firms: evidence from the Japanese manufacturing industry. Appl Econ Lett 11(1):21–32Hyde GC (1989) The relationship between policy and research. In Rosa, P.; Birley, S. Cannon, T. and O´Neill, K. The Role and Contribution of Small Business Research, Chap. 3:55–77, Institute ReportKolvereid L (1996) Prediction of employment status choice intentions. Entrep Theory Pract 21(1):47–57Kourilsky ML, Walstad WB (1998) Entrepreneurship and female youth: knowledge, attitude, gender differences, and educational practices. J Bus Ventur 13(1):77–88Krueger N, Brazeal D (1994) Entrepreneurial Potencial and Potencial Entrepreneurs. Entrep Theory Pract 18(3):91–104Krueger NF, Carsrud AL (1993) Entrepreneurial intentions: applying the theory of planned behaviour. Entrep Reg Dev 5(4):315–330Lanero A, Vázquez JL, Gutiérrez P, García MP (2011) The impact of entrepreneurship education in European universities: an intention-based approach analyzed in the Spanish area. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Marketin 8(2):111–130Miller BK, Bell JD, Palmer M, González A (2009) Predictors of entrepreneurial intentions: a quasi-experiment comparing students enrolled in introductory management and entrepreneurship classes. J Bus Entrep 21(2):39–62Neck HM, Zacharakis AL, Bygrave WD, Reynolds PD (2003) Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2002 executive report. Babson College, Babson, MANorth DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK)North D (1993) Instituciones, cambio institucional y desempeño económico. Fondo de Cultura Económica, MéxicoNorth DC (2005) Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Academic Foundation. University Press, PrincentonGEM Portugal (2012) Estudo sobre o Empreendedorismo. Global Entrepreneruship Monitor (GEM). Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTEIUL) http://web.spi.pt/GEMportugal2012/files/GEM_PORTUGAL_2012.pdfRaposo M, do Paço A, Ferreira J (2008a) Entrepreneur’s profile: a taxonomy of attribu tes and motivations of university students. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 15(2):405–420Raposo MLB, Ferreira JJM, do Paço AMF, Rodrigues RJG (2008b) Propensity to firm creation: empirical research using structural equations. Int Entrep Manag J 4(4):485–504Robinson PB, Stimpson DV, Huefner JC, Hunt HK (1991) An attitude approach to the prediction of entrepreneurship. Entrep Theory Pract 15(4):13–31Samad Aghayi J (2008) Entrepreneurship organization. Public Administration Training Center Publications, TehranScherer RF, Adams JS, Carley S, Wiebe FA (1989) Role model performance effects on development of entrepreneurial career preference. Entrep Theory and Pract, spring:53–71Scherer RF, Brodzinski JD, Wiebe F (1991) Examining the relationship between personality and entrepreneurial career preference. Entrep Reg Dev 3(2):195–206Shane S (2003) A General Theory of Enttrepreneurship- The Individual Oportunity Nexus. Edward Elgar EditoresShapero A (1982) Social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In: Kent CA et al (eds) The encyclopedia of entrepreneurship. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 72–89Shapero A, Sokol L (1982) The social dimensions of entrepreneurship.Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship:72–90Storey DJ (1994) Employment. In Storey, D.J. Understanding the small business sector. Capítulo 6, pp. 160–203. London: RoutledgeToledano N, Urbano D (2008) Promoting entrepreneurial mindsets at universities: a case study in the South of Spain. Eur J Int Manag 2(4):382–399Trequattrini R, Lombardi R, Lardo A, Cuozzo B (2015). The Impact of Entrepreneurial Universities on Regional Growth: a Local Intellectual Capital Perspective. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–13Urbano D (2006) La creación de empresas en Catalunya. Organismos de apoyo y actitudes hacia la actividad emprendedora, Ed. Generalitat de Catalunya-CIDEM, BarcelonaUrbano D, Toledano N (2008) The systems of university education and their influence on the students’ attitudes in the business world: a multiple case study. Oikos 25:87–103Veciana JM (1989) Características del empresario en España. Papeles de Economía Española 39:19–36Veciana JM, Urbano D (2004) Actitudes de los estudiantes universitarios hacia la creación de empresas: un estudio empírico comparativo entre Catalunya y Puerto Rico. El emprendedor innovador y la creación de empresas de I + D + I, University of Valencia, pp 35–58Veciana JM, Aponte M, Urbano D (2005) University student’s attitudes towards entrepreneurship: a two countries comparison. Int Entrep Manag J 1:165–182Wang CK, Wong PK (2004) Entrepreneurial interest of university students in Singapore. Technovation 24(2):163–172White SB, Reynolds PD (1996) Government programs and high growth new firms. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Center for Entrepreneurial Studies Babson College. Wellesley, MA.: 621–635Yari A, Toulabi Z, Pourashraf Y (2013) Designing propensity to entrepreneurship paradigm in Ilam universities (structural equation model approach). J Novel Appl Sci 2:872–88

Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus

Background: Multiple laboratory tests are used to diagnose and manage patients with diabetes mellitus. The quality of the scientific evidence supporting the use of these tests varies substantially. Approach: An expert committee compiled evidence-based recommendations for the use of laboratory testing for patients with diabetes. A new system was developed to grade the overall quality of the evidence and the strength of the recommendations. Draft guidelines were posted on the Internet and presented at the 2007 Arnold O. Beckman Conference. The document was modified in response to oral and written comments, and a revised draft was posted in 2010 and again modified in response to written comments. The National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry and the Evidence-Based Laboratory Medicine Committee of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry jointly reviewed the guidelines, which were accepted after revisions by the Professional Practice Committee and subsequently approved by the Executive Committee of the American Diabetes Association. Content: In addition to long-standing criteria based on measurement of plasma glucose, diabetes can be diagnosed by demonstrating increased blood hemoglobin A$_{1c}$ (HbA$_{1c}$) concentrations. Monitoring of glycemic control is performed by self-monitoring of plasma or blood glucose with meters and by laboratory analysis of HbA$_{1c}$. The potential roles of noninvasive glucose monitoring, genetic testing, and measurement of autoantibodies, urine albumin, insulin, proinsulin, C-peptide, and other analytes are addressed. Summary: The guidelines provide specific recommendations that are based on published data or derived from expert consensus. Several analytes have minimal clinical value at present, and their measurement is not recommended